This week I have been reading a number of
texts about three topics:
One is about the history of “Theological
Hermeneutics”, big words which simply mean that I have been reading about
the systems or frameworks people have used to underpin their study of
scripture.
The second readings were about spirituality
and the different interpretations people have had of that and have today.
The third was bible study about the Easter
Story. One of the concepts addressed there was atonement and the
many references made to that in the Bible.
Returning to the first topic of hermeneutics:
over time people have used different approaches to studying
scripture depending on when and where they were living and what events were
taking place around them. Scripture has to be relevant to the lives of
people and if it ceases to be for any reason, people of goodwill who know scripture
encapsulates truth, need to find a way of hearing that truth.
At one time
people thought that could be achieved by seeing scripture in an allegorical way
but then others saw weaknesses in that method and moved on. Others took the
view that a literal reading was the best whereas today most people use more
analytical approaches, the choice depends on which is most appropriate. The
studies we are doing using those readings reveal a history of complex thinking
which I won't go into now except to say that all of those people were seeking
to hear God’s word but were doing it in different ways.
The second set of readings showed a similar
trend. Not everyone has seen spirituality in the same light
historically, and nor do they today. In the past spirituality was a very
Christian and pious way of living and associated with those who lived apart
from the world.
Not so today. To start with, spirituality isn't confined to
Christians and many people who profess other beliefs or profess to be atheists
say they seek to live spiritual lives. Again, the several texts I have read
have quite different views on living a spiritual life and they are all
right because each way works for the people who promote them.
And then the Bible Studies about Easter: some of us have grown up in churches and have been taught in Sunday School in a way that only offers one view of the atonement. For many it was that Jesus stood as a substitute for us and our sins.
It was only as an adult that I
even heard that not all theologians see the atonement in that way. In
looking further afield I found that not only do the majority of Christians
believe in the Substitution or Satisfaction theory but there are many other
theories such as the Penal theory, the Moral Influence theory and the
Non-Violent Theory and others still which are believed by fewer people.
All have aspects which are helpful and even those which are widely accepted have aspects which are unhelpful.
All have aspects which are helpful and even those which are widely accepted have aspects which are unhelpful.
We can only do this successfully if we keep
our hearts and minds open to the guidance of God’s Spirit.
No comments:
Post a Comment