This week the reading I focused on was from
Ephesians 1: 3-14 where Paul was trying to assure the gentile community of
their place in the Kingdom.
He tells the people there that God has
called them from before the beginning of time, despite what anyone else may
have been saying to them.
Much has been made of these verses over the
years and there has been discussion about how it clashes with the notion of
free will. Further, if some are predestined to belong, the corollary is that
some are predestined not to belong which is at odds with all that Jesus
preached.
So, my interpretation is that in an effort
to cement in the minds of the Ephesians that they were valid members of the
kingdom in a way which could not be undermined later, Paul used extreme
language to make his point.
Of course, some people have not accepted the
invitation to be redeemed, which is clear, because of all the evil in the
world.
I added to this by making the point that we
should be very careful about judging others because some so-called “sins” we
see in them or suffer guilt about ourselves could simply be breaks in cultural
norms.
Therefore our assumption should always be
that others are children of God, whether they know it or not.
And whether a person has accepted the
redemption offered or not, our task is to continue showing them the love of
God.
As an application of this, I shared details
about the work done by our local Christian Community Aid. It should be noted
that most of the people helped by CCA are people who are isolated for one
reason or other and more than anything need gathering into the community.
The message was timely because on the
previous day our National Assembly released the decision made about whether the
Uniting Church in Australia would marry same-gender couples.
A decision was carried by more than
two-thirds majority was:
“that the most profitable way forward
was to offer two different definitions of marriage, essentially one between ‘a
man and a woman’ and the other between ‘two people.’” and then that both
ministers and church councils should decide separately as to whether they
could, in good conscience marry or not marry same-gender couples.
It was noted that for some this was a
more radical change than they were comfortable with, while for others it did
not go far enough.
The implication is that there are now
people in the Uniting Church in Australia who are grieving over this matter.
Our prayer is that they will find a way to experience solidarity with those who
are in favour of the change as they find previously.
Division was never sought. Those
seeking change wanted it in the name of offering people of any sexual
orientation the same gift of marriage as heterosexual people enjoyed.
However, as in any disagreement, our
concern for each other can hold us together. One of our ministers wrote most
eloquently:
The Uniting Church has a courageous
heritage. This Assembly has seen us live this out in a range of bold,
wonderful, and painful decisions. We are all God’s people, so may we now focus
on what unites us and be about God’s business - reconciliation and renewal.
To that I can only say AMEN! v
No comments:
Post a Comment